Samsung ZET Review. What happens is users end up tuning the drive to suit their needs. Most relevant reviews See all 88 reviews. Disassembly Taking the drive apart was easy after removing countless precision Phillips head screws. With our custom StorageMark traces we hope that no matter what, any reader can see how drives stack up against each other in everyday situations. If you have a new laptop than get the new one.

Uploader: Goltimuro
Date Added: 27 May 2005
File Size: 55.7 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 35861
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

In the second column are the general specs for the reference platforms this SATA II hard drive is to be compared against. Most synthetic benchmarks work with such random data that it defeats or greatly limits any internal caching algorithms used by Seagate. Mmoentus activity was slightly higher on the XT, drawing 3.

SLC has a useful life of aroundwrite cycles with MLC reaching its limit at 10, write cycles. That is where the similarities end though. Skip to main content.

In our IOMeter and CrystalDiskMark tests you will only see raw performance, which normally might translate into real world scenarios.

Disassembly Taking the drive apart was easy after removing countless precision Phillips head screws. You may also like. My laptop takes two drives and I had, a very short time earlier, already upgraded one of them the primary windows drive to a Seagate GB Adaptive Memory then moves the most frequently accessed information to flash memory for faster recall than what is possible from the platter part of the drive.


The boot speed actually decreases with use as the drive “learns”. Momentua users might still want to consider other options in their workhorse machines however, if speed is worthwhile at all costs and capacity is less of a concern. For reference, Seagate lists an average idle power rate of 1.

Seagate Momentus XT GB Internal RPM ” (STAS) HDD | eBay

With the circuit board removed we finally get to see what makes this drive so special. The first real-life test is our HTPC scenario. To test this configuration we turned to our trusty Lenovo ThinkPad W and used its dual 2.

The achilles heel to Seagate’s technology is that it does nothing for random data or programs and files which are infrequently accessed.

Seagate Momentus XT 750GB Review

You can get free software to clone the disk and once that is done momentuus just swap your old hard drive for your new one. Against No write acceleration Power use same as traditional drive. Big improvement in my macbook’s startup momentuss for a good price.

At its worst it still offers a significant boost in performance over its older Intel Core i7 45nm Clock Speed: It helps when comparing drives in every setting possible, but it doesn’t exactly work out into faster everyday usage or better game moentus times. To the naked eye nothing about this drive indicates that it is unlike any other notebook drive on the market. In fact, Seagate uses the same internals on the new XT that were used in the previous This gets closer to what you might see in the real world, although the data is still far from what you would see in practice.


Now when I turn on my laptop With 11 ms read seek time and 13 ms write momsntus time, this System hard drive offers faster command processing.

Packaging should be the same xy what is found in a retail momsntus, unless the item is handmade or was packaged by the manufacturer in non-retail packaging, such as an unprinted box or plastic bag. If you are new to StorageReview, one thing we try to focus on is how any given drive might perform under real-world conditions. Seagate’s Momentus XT is a 2. Beginners Guides Cases and Access. Any Condition Any Condition.

The Seagate Momentus XT manages to crank out more performance than any other notebook hard drive on the market, while keeping prices reasonable and capacities high. All hdd hard drive ,we test before sending. An SSD doesn’t make sense for everyone, a drive that costs more than the notebook it’s in isn’t practical for most users.